A Gut-Full of Probiotics for Your Neurological Well-Being

Probiotics, often referred to as ‘good bacteria’, are known to promote a healthy gut, but can they promote a healthy mind? Exploring the new world of neurological probiotics, researchers in BioEssays present new ideas on how neurochemicals delivered directly to the gut, via probiotic intestinal microbiota, exert their beneficial effects in maintaining gastrointestinal health and even psychological well-being.

The research, led by Professor Mark Lyte from Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center,1 proposes that through a unifying process of microbial endocrinology, neurochemical-producing probiotics could act as a delivery mechanism for neuroactive compounds that could improve a host’s gastrointestinal and psychological health.

“This paper proposes a new field of microbial endocrinology, where microbiology meets neuroscience,” said Lyte. “There is already evidence to suggest that the connection between gut microbes and the nervous system represents a viable route for influencing neurological function. A recent study in mice, for example, showed that the presence of neurochemicals such a serotonin in the bloodstream was due to direct uptake from the gut.” Continue reading

Conservation Biogeography

This past spring, Wiley published the first comprehensive review of the field conservation biogeography, aptly named Conservation Biogeography. To find out more about this field, we sat down with one of the book’s two editors, Dr. Robert J. Whittaker (the other being Dr. Richard J. Ladle), and asked him some questions about the genesis of their book and what can and should be done by both scientists and citizens to preserve our planet.

  • What is conservation biogeography?
    In a nutshell, it is the study of the dynamics of species distributions individually and collectively, at all scales of analysis, to inform conservation policy.
  • When was the sub-discipline of biogeography known as “conservation biogeography” developed and by whom?
    This has quite a lot to do with the International Biogeography Society, which was founded about 10 years ago, and which included a focus on conservation in its core mission statement. The second meeting of the society was dedicated to Conservation Biogeography and several chapters of the resulting conference publication Frontiers of Biogeography: New Directions in the Geography of Nature (Lomolino, M.V. & Heaney, L.R. 2004, Sinauer) were on the theme of Conservation Biogeography. In 2005, the journal Diversity and Distributions identified itself as a journal of conservation biogeography, carrying our 2005 paper (Whittaker et al. 2005) in the first issue.1

Continue reading

New Social Science Virtual Issue from Conservation Letters

Learn how old-growth forests are irreplaceable for sustaining biodiversity and wolves can help scientists understand how people form ethical decisions about conservation issues in a new Social Science virtual issue of the multidisciplinary journal Conservation Letters.

Handpicked by Co-Editor-in-Chief, Michael B. Mascia, the 20 articles in this issue are freely available online until December 12, 2011, and many of them have already been featured in other media such as Nature, National Geographic, Forbes, The New York Times, BBC, and CNN.

Some highlights include:

  • Exploring the ethical basis for conservation policy: the case of inbred wolves on Isle Royale, USA1
  • Predictions of ecological and social impacts of alternative residential development policies to inform decision making in a rural landscape2
  •  Cost-effective conservation: calculating biodiversity and logging trade-offs in Southeast Asia3

Stay connected to Conservation Letters through e-Alerts, Facebook, and Twitter.

Interested in books on conservation? Visit check out Wiley’s extensive Environmental Sciences collection, which includes books such as

1.Gore, M., Nelson, M., Vucetich, J., Smith, A., & Clark, M. (2011). Exploring the ethical basis for conservation policy: the case of inbred wolves on Isle Royale, USA Conservation Letters, 4 (5), 394-401 DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2011.00191.x

2.Goldberg, C., Pocewicz, A., Nielsen-Pincus, M., Waits, L., Morgan, P., Force, J., & Vierling, L. (2011). Predictions of ecological and social impacts of alternative residential development policies to inform decision making in a rural landscape Conservation Letters DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2011.00194.x

3. Fisher, B., Edwards, D., Larsen, T., Ansell, F., Hsu, W., Roberts, C., & Wilcove, D. (2011). Cost-effective conservation: calculating biodiversity and logging trade-offs in Southeast Asia Conservation Letters DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2011.00198.x